TDMI decision type
SARU
Leaping After Hesitation
You choose away from the preset with hesitation or changes before deciding.
This is a general type guide. Take the test to see your own response times and changes of choice.
Compare with other responses
These are anonymous completed responses from the LoveType version. They do not include the original site's samples.
Loading response data…
Reading this type: Leaping After Hesitation
You choose away from the preset with hesitation or changes before deciding. Even with active involvement, the process is not uniform. Reflect on the difference between acting after doubt and knowing your answer throughout.
What the four letters mean
- S: Basis of judgment. Across the 7 attribute-based questions, the indicator falls on the side away from the preset victim route, including a zero-score boundary. This does not establish a person's moral worth.
- A: Mode of involvement. Active input and recorded choices are reflected across the run, including its unanswered rounds.
- R: Response consistency. The combined indicator of answer direction and timing shows variation. This does not directly measure emotional or personality stability.
- U: Decision speed. The median response time and changes of choice indicate more time spent deciding.
Compare with your own record
What finally settled your decision? When you changed your choice, did your priorities change between the first and final selection?
The mean shown on the result page measures time to the final change on answered questions. The speed axis instead also uses the median and unanswered records. You cannot infer the four-letter code from the mean alone.
Boundaries and taking the test again
An axis on a scoring boundary should not be read as a strong tendency either way. Even if the code assigns a letter, prioritize the report's boundary marker. The same routes can produce different results if timing or changes differ.
This is an entertainment and discussion test using fictional situations. It is not a basis for judging real relationships, abilities or moral worth. Use an unexpected result to discuss what you considered in specific scenes, rather than labeling yourself or someone else.