TDMI decision type
SARI
The Emotional Reflex Intervener
You intervene quickly while leaving answers different from the preset.
This is a general type guide. Take the test to see your own response times and changes of choice.
Compare with other responses
These are anonymous completed responses from the LoveType version. They do not include the original site's samples.
Loading response data…
Reading this type: The Emotional Reflex Intervener
You intervene quickly while leaving answers different from the preset. Variation in choices and timing means you may not have applied the same rule everywhere. Even apparently reflexive choices may reflect differences you noticed in each scene.
What the four letters mean
- S: Basis of judgment. Across the 7 attribute-based questions, the indicator falls on the side away from the preset victim route, including a zero-score boundary. This does not establish a person's moral worth.
- A: Mode of involvement. Active input and recorded choices are reflected across the run, including its unanswered rounds.
- R: Response consistency. The combined indicator of answer direction and timing shows variation. This does not directly measure emotional or personality stability.
- I: Decision speed. The median response time and changes of choice indicate relatively quick responses.
Compare with your own record
Did the reason for a quick decision apply elsewhere? Did the conditions change how responsible you felt for choosing?
The mean shown on the result page measures time to the final change on answered questions. The speed axis instead also uses the median and unanswered records. You cannot infer the four-letter code from the mean alone.
Boundaries and taking the test again
An axis on a scoring boundary should not be read as a strong tendency either way. Even if the code assigns a letter, prioritize the report's boundary marker. The same routes can produce different results if timing or changes differ.
This is an entertainment and discussion test using fictional situations. It is not a basis for judging real relationships, abilities or moral worth. Use an unexpected result to discuss what you considered in specific scenes, rather than labeling yourself or someone else.