TDMI decision type
KOTU
The Spectator of Pure Reason
Some answers lean toward the preset, while other responses show reluctance to decide.
This is a general type guide. Take the test to see your own response times and changes of choice.
Compare with other responses
These are anonymous completed responses from the LoveType version. They do not include the original site's samples.
Loading response data…
Reading this type: The Spectator of Pure Reason
Some answers lean toward the preset, while other responses show reluctance to decide. The record alone cannot distinguish time spent thinking more deeply from hesitation about making a choice at all.
What the four letters mean
- K: Basis of judgment. Across the 7 attribute-based questions, more answers follow the victim route preset by the test. The preset itself is not a correct moral answer.
- O: Mode of involvement. Your record shows relatively restrained involvement, including unanswered rounds. The reason for not choosing cannot be determined from the record alone.
- T: Response consistency. The combined indicator of answer direction and choice timing shows consistency. This does not directly measure emotional or personality stability.
- U: Decision speed. The median response time and changes of choice indicate more time spent deciding.
Compare with your own record
While waiting, were you weighing the two routes? Do you spend similar time on everyday decisions where no choice is required?
The mean shown on the result page measures time to the final change on answered questions. The speed axis instead also uses the median and unanswered records. You cannot infer the four-letter code from the mean alone.
Boundaries and taking the test again
An axis on a scoring boundary should not be read as a strong tendency either way. Even if the code assigns a letter, prioritize the report's boundary marker. The same routes can produce different results if timing or changes differ.
This is an entertainment and discussion test using fictional situations. It is not a basis for judging real relationships, abilities or moral worth. Use an unexpected result to discuss what you considered in specific scenes, rather than labeling yourself or someone else.